Book: 'Red' State Kids at Much Greater Risk Than Those in 'Blue' States
Living in a "red" state appears to be more hazardous to the health of millions of American children, according to startling data contained in a major new book, Homeland Insecurity ... American Children at Risk available free on the Web.
The factors weighed in the "Homeland Insecurity" ranking includes such diverse indicators as inadequate pre-natal care, lack of health care insurance coverage, early death, child abuse, hunger and teen incarceration.
Based on a diverse range of 11 child-related statistical measures, nine of the 10 top states with the best outcomes for children today are "blue"states (Wisconsin, Iowa, New Jersey, Washington, Minnesota, Nebraska, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Vermont and No. 1-ranked New Hampshire, with Iowa being the sole "red" state in the group) and all 10 of the bottom states with the worst outcomes for children are "red" states (Wyoming, Georgia, Arkansas, Alabama, South Carolina, Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Louisiana and, in last place, Mississippi).
The political dividing lines used in the book are "red" states (those that voted Republican in the 2004 presidential election) versus "blue"states (those that voted Democratic). Homeland Insecurity ... American Children at Risk outlines a $500-billion "Invest in Kids" agenda to reverse the harmful impact of conservative ideology on children caused by the failure to invest in documented children's needs and by federal andstate cuts in taxes and children's programs beginning in the early 1980s and accelerating since 2001, according to the book's author.
Michael Petit, author of Homeland Insecurity ... American Children at Risk, and founder of Every Child Matters, says: "The bottom line here is that where a child lives can be a major factor in that youth's abilityto survive and thrive in America. The reason why this is the case is no mystery: 'Blue' states tend to tax themselves at significantly higher levels, which makes it possible to reach more children and families with beneficial health, social and education programs. 'Red' states overwhelmingly are home to decades-long adherence to anti-government and anti-tax ideology that often runs directly contrary to the needs of healthy children and stable families."
How serious is it for many children today in "red" states?
The"red"/"blue" state dividing line is clear on issue after issue cited in Homeland Insecurity, the author says:
* A child in the bottom 10 states is twice as likely to die by the age of 14 as are children in the top 10. All 10 of the bottom states of this measure are "red" states. All of the top 10 states are "blue" states.
* Children in the bottom 10 states are 1.8 times as likely to be uninsured as children in the top 10. Nine of the 10 states in the bottom of this measure are "red" states. Eight of the top 10 states are "blue" states.
* Children in the bottom 10 states are seven times more likely to die from abuse and neglect as are children in the top states. Nine of the 10 bottom states of this measure are "red" states. Eight of the top 10 states are "blue" states.
* A child in a bottom-10 state is more than twice as likely to be living in poverty as a child in a top-10 states. All of the 10 states in the bottom are "red" states. Six of the top 10 states are "blue" states.
* Women in the bottom 10 states are more than twice as likely to receive inadequate prenatal care as women in the top 10 states. Eight of 10 states in the bottom of this measure are "red" states. Seven of the top 10 states are "blue" states.
* Juveniles in the bottom 10 states are almost two and a half times as likely to be incarcerated as juveniles in the top 10. Eight of the 10 bottom states of this measure are "red" states. Seven of the top 10 are "blue" states.
* Children in the bottom 10 states are 74 percent more likely to die before their first birthday as are children in the top 10. Eight of the 10 states in the bottom of this measure are "red" states. Seven of the top 10 states are "blue" states.
In order to illustrate the gap between "red" and "blue" states, the new book points to the serious circumstances facing more than a million children today in one of the crucibles of "compassionate conservatism": Texas. The Lone Star state has the highest percentage of uninsured children in the nation (24.6 percent v. 15.7 percent nationally), the fourth worst rate of immunizing two year-olds (75 percent v. 84 percent nationwide) and a teen birth rate that is 50 percent higher than the national average. There are more uninsured children in Texas (1.24 million) than there are in 26 other states combined, including such large-population states as Oregon, Minnesota, Louisiana, Colorado and Wisconsin. Texas also ranks No. 1 in both child abuse deaths and the percentage of households experiencing "food insecurity" (16.4 percent versus 11.4 percent nationwide).
Bookmark http://universeeverything.blogspot.com/ and drop back in sometime.
The factors weighed in the "Homeland Insecurity" ranking includes such diverse indicators as inadequate pre-natal care, lack of health care insurance coverage, early death, child abuse, hunger and teen incarceration.
Based on a diverse range of 11 child-related statistical measures, nine of the 10 top states with the best outcomes for children today are "blue"states (Wisconsin, Iowa, New Jersey, Washington, Minnesota, Nebraska, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Vermont and No. 1-ranked New Hampshire, with Iowa being the sole "red" state in the group) and all 10 of the bottom states with the worst outcomes for children are "red" states (Wyoming, Georgia, Arkansas, Alabama, South Carolina, Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Louisiana and, in last place, Mississippi).
The political dividing lines used in the book are "red" states (those that voted Republican in the 2004 presidential election) versus "blue"states (those that voted Democratic). Homeland Insecurity ... American Children at Risk outlines a $500-billion "Invest in Kids" agenda to reverse the harmful impact of conservative ideology on children caused by the failure to invest in documented children's needs and by federal andstate cuts in taxes and children's programs beginning in the early 1980s and accelerating since 2001, according to the book's author.
Michael Petit, author of Homeland Insecurity ... American Children at Risk, and founder of Every Child Matters, says: "The bottom line here is that where a child lives can be a major factor in that youth's abilityto survive and thrive in America. The reason why this is the case is no mystery: 'Blue' states tend to tax themselves at significantly higher levels, which makes it possible to reach more children and families with beneficial health, social and education programs. 'Red' states overwhelmingly are home to decades-long adherence to anti-government and anti-tax ideology that often runs directly contrary to the needs of healthy children and stable families."
How serious is it for many children today in "red" states?
The"red"/"blue" state dividing line is clear on issue after issue cited in Homeland Insecurity, the author says:
* A child in the bottom 10 states is twice as likely to die by the age of 14 as are children in the top 10. All 10 of the bottom states of this measure are "red" states. All of the top 10 states are "blue" states.
* Children in the bottom 10 states are 1.8 times as likely to be uninsured as children in the top 10. Nine of the 10 states in the bottom of this measure are "red" states. Eight of the top 10 states are "blue" states.
* Children in the bottom 10 states are seven times more likely to die from abuse and neglect as are children in the top states. Nine of the 10 bottom states of this measure are "red" states. Eight of the top 10 states are "blue" states.
* A child in a bottom-10 state is more than twice as likely to be living in poverty as a child in a top-10 states. All of the 10 states in the bottom are "red" states. Six of the top 10 states are "blue" states.
* Women in the bottom 10 states are more than twice as likely to receive inadequate prenatal care as women in the top 10 states. Eight of 10 states in the bottom of this measure are "red" states. Seven of the top 10 states are "blue" states.
* Juveniles in the bottom 10 states are almost two and a half times as likely to be incarcerated as juveniles in the top 10. Eight of the 10 bottom states of this measure are "red" states. Seven of the top 10 are "blue" states.
* Children in the bottom 10 states are 74 percent more likely to die before their first birthday as are children in the top 10. Eight of the 10 states in the bottom of this measure are "red" states. Seven of the top 10 states are "blue" states.
In order to illustrate the gap between "red" and "blue" states, the new book points to the serious circumstances facing more than a million children today in one of the crucibles of "compassionate conservatism": Texas. The Lone Star state has the highest percentage of uninsured children in the nation (24.6 percent v. 15.7 percent nationally), the fourth worst rate of immunizing two year-olds (75 percent v. 84 percent nationwide) and a teen birth rate that is 50 percent higher than the national average. There are more uninsured children in Texas (1.24 million) than there are in 26 other states combined, including such large-population states as Oregon, Minnesota, Louisiana, Colorado and Wisconsin. Texas also ranks No. 1 in both child abuse deaths and the percentage of households experiencing "food insecurity" (16.4 percent versus 11.4 percent nationwide).
Bookmark http://universeeverything.blogspot.com/ and drop back in sometime.
Labels: blue state, child abuse, children, children at risk, hunger, kids, red state
posted by Scott Nance at
1/25/2007 04:52:00 AM
1 Comments:
THIS IS the most hysterical bit of MISINFORMATION that I have ever SEEN! The reason NH is NUMBER #1 for the healthiest kids is, it's been a RED STATE for 84 years.
This is the first time it's had a D majority in that time or longer.
So, your 'blue state dreams' are a bunch of hokey.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home